Independence
Day celebrations are novel events for us here at Wrong Way. The fact that the freedom of our own island from colonial rule has never been achieved to the
majority of our past liberators’ wishes means independence is an awkward
subject for us Irish.
So instead of a national day commemorating a political foundation, we celebrate our submission to Christianity – or what is commonly referred to as St Patrick’s Day.
So instead of a national day commemorating a political foundation, we celebrate our submission to Christianity – or what is commonly referred to as St Patrick’s Day.
In the past year, though, we’ve been able to
witness at first hand a couple of nations getting all patriotic and merry to
mark their birth as free countries – Chile last 18 September and more recently Colombia on 20 July.
Independence Day celebrations in Bogotá, Colombia. |
These natives – well, those who remained – were reduced to mere silent and powerless spectators as the Old World invaders divvied up as their own what is Mother Nature’s earth.
OK,
there was some interbreeding between old natives and new settlers but for the
indigenous that meant surrendering to the Spanish way of life – the opposite
seldom occurred. Of course, this isn’t a unique story, the same happened in North
America and in many colonised lands.
Hence, we
can only imagine that these Independence Day celebrations are met with, at
the very least, indifference among the indigenous. It must be like having a
party in your own house that not only you do not want but the organisers didn’t
even invite you or ask for your permission to hold it. And then you’re left to
clean up the mess.
For some of the old natives – particularly the tribal indigenous – the country and its borders that is Colombia or Venezuela or wherever doesn’t even exist. They live in a world – or at least tried to – without man-made borders. (For a previous article related to this topic, see Phantom Freedom at: http://bit.ly/SOQUl0.)
For some of the old natives – particularly the tribal indigenous – the country and its borders that is Colombia or Venezuela or wherever doesn’t even exist. They live in a world – or at least tried to – without man-made borders. (For a previous article related to this topic, see Phantom Freedom at: http://bit.ly/SOQUl0.)
This whole
indigenous versus Latino question is very topical in Colombia at the moment. In
the country’s south-western department of Cauca, where both the indigenous
populations and the outlawed Farc are at their strongest, the old natives have
taken it upon themselves to defend what they see as theirs.
They claim that the presence of the Colombian military in the area – to "pacify" the region as far as the Government’s official line goes – only attracts more Farc attacks, which have been numerous in recent times. Their lack of confidence in the state’s security to adequately protect them is deeply rooted in history.
They claim that the presence of the Colombian military in the area – to "pacify" the region as far as the Government’s official line goes – only attracts more Farc attacks, which have been numerous in recent times. Their lack of confidence in the state’s security to adequately protect them is deeply rooted in history.
Meanwhile,
for many Spanish Colombians living in the big cities, their belief is that
the indigenous are in the pocket of the Farc – the removal of the army will
only serve to strengthen the rebels, no more, no less. There could, certainly,
be some truth to that. But it’s quite arrogantly dismissive of the indigenous’
own, unique concerns.
Of course, any group of people that feels it is being mistreated is quick to point to the rights it believes it is entitled to. The indigenous in these parts have a strong
case going back hundreds of years in this regard. But as we all should know,
with rights come responsibilities.
Too often, different minorities are quick to demand the former, yet fail to face up to the latter. For one, if you claim you don’t recognise a certain authority or state and thus will not be bound by its rules, it’s a little bit rich to be asking for benefits and assistance from said authority or state.
Too often, different minorities are quick to demand the former, yet fail to face up to the latter. For one, if you claim you don’t recognise a certain authority or state and thus will not be bound by its rules, it’s a little bit rich to be asking for benefits and assistance from said authority or state.
In an Irish context, the IRA and Sinn Féin know all
about that. Sometimes you just have to face up to the reality of a situation,
no matter how disagreeable it may be for you.
As ever in
such conflicts, and as alluded to above, the lack of trust in the motives of the
other side is at the heart of the problem here.
The gun, however, has rarely
provided a long-term, satisfactory, solution. These Independence Day celebrations could be seen as proof of that.
Good article Brendan, I think each part playing the roll should face up to the reality, heading forward and coming to an final agreement, which is convenient for all, though they are reluctant to accept each other because of past disputes.Cheers.
ReplyDeleteIndeed 'Colombiana'. As with every conflict across the globe, there has to be a bit of give & take. As Albert Einstein said: 'We cannot solve problems on the same level of awareness that we created them.'
ReplyDeleteEs una buena reflexión sobre lo que significa la independencia, no solo en Colombia y Chile, sino prácticamente en toda Latinoamércia, pluriétnica y multicultural. Además es interesante su posición crítica ante la situación de los grupos indígenas, que comparto en buena medida, viniendo usted de otro continente con contextos diferentes.
ReplyDeleteSaludos!
Gracias para su comentario Ama - en espanol también! Somos pluriétnica y multicultural aquí!
ReplyDelete