Sunday, 25 March 2012

"Dangerous" Colombia

There are two basic ways you can gather information about a place. One option is to speak to the people who have been there to get their thoughts on the location or else you can go and discover it for yourself.

Obviously, where possible, the latter option is far more beneficial. Reality, after all, is what you perceive it to be.
"Dangerous" Colombia: A mock photo of our blogger being held at gunpoint by a willing Colombian soldier at La Ciudad Perdida
Typical Colombian scene, so some think.
Therefore, your perceptions of anything should be greatly increased by witnessing it. 

Of course, in a world where we can be ‘virtually’ transplanted to any part of the globe in seconds, many people like to think they’ve a decent idea of far-flung places without actually having been there. But knowledge gained in this fashion is very much dependent on the source.

Specifically speaking, here at ‘Wrong Way’ we were given a reminder of the outside perception of Colombia this week, particular that of the richer Western world. It’s a view that, thankfully, we had almost forgotten after having being based here for some time. 

What we’re referring to is, in short, the thinking that Colombia is a relatively backward, extremely unsafe and unstable country where locals and expats alike live in constant fear for their lives. 

It’s an image that the state is desperately, but seemingly with little success, trying to shake off – the national tourist board’s slogan of ‘The only danger is wanting to stay’ being one semi-humorous attempt to portray a more positive global impression.

What got us thinking of this largely misplaced negative global opinion about Colombia were a couple of emails we received from home expressing concern for our safety in Bogotá. 

What’s more, the reason why there was worry from the ‘motherland’ wasn’t even based on first-hand information. 

An elderly uncle living in Chicago saw on the news there that, we can only assume, it had all ‘kicked off’ in Colombia. This, again we have to suppose, all spiralled from a US news report on the killing of 11 Colombian soldiers by Farc rebels, in the department of Arauca, 250 miles north-east of Bogotá. 

Now, terrible as that is, it does not mean the whole country is under siege. But for many people, including some foreign journalists who live in environments here which are quite removed from the daily lives of the vast majority of locals, such an incident fits perfectly into their image of a volatile country. Therefore, any killing here is a sign of Colombia’s endemic insecurity.

Just to contrast, at the same time of the murders of the Colombian soldiers, you had a Muslim radical killing an innocent group of Jews in Toulouse, France. Again, an awful tragedy and considering the victims were civilians you could make a case that it was a greater act of evil than the events in Arauca. 

Yet nobody – as far as we are aware – took this as a sign that France is on the brink, a place where bloodshed and general mayhem are rife. Such thinking would be just silly, right?
A small group of students in a peaceful dance protest in Bogotá, Colombia
'Dangerous' Bogotá - a harmless student protest dance.
From our experiences, daily life in Colombia and Bogotá specifically, in terms of the feeling of security, is on a par with what you get in France or other similar countries. 

Yes, there are dangerous people and areas best to be avoided, but these exist in every city or country, especially heavily populated ones. 

It must be pointed out at this stage that ignorance can be just as dangerous as it is sometimes bliss. On that front, we might be guilty of not being fully aware of all the risks that potentially exist here – our first-hand knowledge of the country after all is just over three years old and hap-hazard at that. 

Many of the locals, especially those from the upper classes, tend to perpetuate the belief that the place is very dangerous. Who are we to disagree with those who were actually born and bred here? 

These people, however, are inclined to stay in their ‘safe-zones’, rarely venturing outside of them into what they perceive as no-go areas. Such practices are based on decades of fierce instability, something which understandably takes time to move on from. 

Nevertheless, going by what we have personally seen and encountered, as well as what other foreigners tell us, we happily must state Colombia seems a reasonably safe place. 

For the rest of our time in the country, here’s hoping we can continue to spread such a message.

5 comments:

  1. A perfect example of middle classes living in fear in Colombia is in Cali where the middle to upper classes are so afraid to go out on the streets that the streets invariably are quite empty and dark at night thus making it more dangerous. It´s really a case of the chicken and the egg and the vicious cycle must be broken.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well I suppose the younger generation are being told the stories of when things were much worse and are still advised to avoid certain areas. I discovered more-or-less the same kind of thing while living in Belfast - of course though you've got vicious sectarianism thrown into the mix there...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think this topic is worst seen from abroad because of the "propaganda". Authorities here try hard to control dangerous acts from unruled groups. But in big cities these things happen, take the recent episode of Tolouse,as you mentioned above. Yes, there are areas best to be avoided, so you'd better don't expose. On the other hand, you must know there are real "life stories" in this named 'dangerous places' also. So it is a relative propaganda.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Cheers for the comment Colombiana. And 'God' bless you Pieter!

    ReplyDelete