A few years
back we made a public call, via a newspaper letter and its subsequent broadcasting
on radio, asking that the use of mobile phones be banned in public places.
The
main reason for this came about after numerous bus journeys in our native
Ireland where people were yapping away for all to hear about their latest
weekend escapades or what have you.
It appears that the boundaries between
private and public conversations become blurred for some people when they
speak on their mobiles.
Our letter plea was well received in many quarters at
the time — someone felt it even warranted a Noble Peace Prize nomination, we
kid you not. Alas, however, there has been very little corrective action in this
regard, be it in our native land or further afield.
Yes, there
is little doubt that mobiles have revolutionised the way we connect and
communicate with each other — in many ways for the better — but you must ask
the question, is it at the expense of face-to-face interaction? The anecdotal
evidence would suggest yes.
If people aren’t talking on their cellular, then
the likelihood is that they are either ‘pinging’ somebody, listening to music,
messing around with some sort of app or whatever else they can do on these
fancy pieces of plastic (you’re right, we’ve yet to be bitten by the smart-phone bug). The ‘real’ person sitting beside them doesn’t exist any more.
OK, judging by many of the conversations we’ve overheard such as the ones alluded to in the opening paragraph, we wouldn’t be that keen to speak to such people anyway, but there might be some individuals who are worth the effort. The mobile, though — especially more advanced models — has become a barrier to in-the-flesh communication.
OK, judging by many of the conversations we’ve overheard such as the ones alluded to in the opening paragraph, we wouldn’t be that keen to speak to such people anyway, but there might be some individuals who are worth the effort. The mobile, though — especially more advanced models — has become a barrier to in-the-flesh communication.
This is
particular apparent in pubs and bars. The chance of a random chat with somebody
has been greatly diminished in recent years.
When people find themselves on
their own, rather than look for somebody to talk to or at least be available for a chat, they go to the comfort of their phone for company. (Why would anyone miss out on the chance to converse with 'Wrong Way'?)
Now, you might say that radio and TV have also had a negative impact on real,
physical interaction, but not as close to the extent as the new-age phones
together with the social networking websites such as Facebook and Twitter
have had.
![]() |
| Thanks Facebook - we, um, like you, too. |
Radio is obviously far less intrusive and demanding than TV but
for its part, the ‘great conversation stopper’ in the corner can often be the
source of conversations, especially in public houses.
You really can’t say the same for mobile phones while Facebook and its ilk are even more harmful to natural communication.
People will waste away hours of their time virtually chatting to friends and acquaintances at the expense of actually
going out meeting somebody in person. For social beings that most of us are,
that can’t be good for body or mind.
Another worrying aspect on the Facebook front is that it can actually be quite damaging to some people’s mental health, especially those at a low point in their lives.
It can, at times, paint a picture that all your connections are having a wonderful
time while your life is banging along at the bottom. But instead of logging off
and heading out which would seem the sensible thing to do, these people stay hooked in,
becoming in a sense new-age, social network voyeurs.
In fact, in a previous article (see: ‘Mi Amor’ – or perhaps not?’)
we jokingly had a go at how some Colombian female acquaintances are quick to
delete you from Facebook if things turn even slightly sour. Perhaps, though, they’re
right if moving on is what they want to do.
Of course, social network sites, mobile phones and all these things are just tools — they are
not inherently evil in their own right. It’s how you use or, more importantly,
misuse them that’s at the heart of the matter here.
From our point of view Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn have helped us gain and maintain a plethora of
contacts across the globe. Without such outlets, these new connections would
have been next to impossible to not only sustain but to find in the first
place.
However, virtual communication should not come at the expense of real-life, face-to-face contact. If we let this happen, we'll all end up like the person sitting at the computer at the final stage of that ubiquitous evolution poster. Hermits — but with technology.


