Colombia's passive examination system

@wwaycorrigan

[For an audio/vlog version of this story, click here.]

A few years ago, a Colombian ex — of sorts — asked me for some urgent help. She had an English exam to take for her university. If she didn't pass it, she wouldn't be able to graduate.

She had one slight problem, though. She had very little English. Well, she practically didn't speak the language at all.

'The exam must be passed; by somebody, it doesn't matter who.'

Not-very-testing times

Cue a couple of weeks of intense English classes dictated by me to get her up to scratch. That, of course, would have been the more righteous approach. What really happened? I took the exam for her. She still, rather pathetically, had a hold over me at the time. And she knew it. At least she did watch me answer the questions; I'll give her that much.

The way that text-only, multiple-choice exam was set up — fully online, unrecorded, and with a very loose student verification mechanism — it seemed as if the university didn't really care if it was taken by the student who was meant to take it.

In other words, it effectively encouraged cheating, particularly in a country where the overall level of English, as well as the desire to speak it, is low.

Around that time, I did write a piece, Colombian universities' English at all costs, questioning the requirement for a certain level of English in courses where knowledge of the language was far from essential.

'It's not that the student must pass the test. It's a case of — using, pertinently, English's passive voice — the test must be passed . . . by somebody, it doesn't matter who.'

But eight years or so have passed since that old flame asked for my assistance; plenty of time for the universities and language institutes to re-evaluate their procedures and amend them where necessary. Except, from my latest experience, they haven't.

Sound system

For one particular institute, in any case, the acceptance of cheating — or at least playing the system — is even more blatant than what I'd witnessed before.

Here's what happened: An 18-year-old who I've never met — he was given my contact details by a production assistant on a shoot in which I recently participated — asked me to take his test for him.

This time, however, it wasn't a text exam. It was an oral one. Yes, an interview via a Zoom call. Thing is, it can be done without using the camera. The examiner just wants to hear the student's voice.

Thus, with my, um, Mid-Atlantic English accent — or is it still a west of Ireland one? — I assumed the identity of this Bogotá native teenager.

Now, if the one conducting the interview — Laura, a Colombian, who was visible to me throughout the call — genuinely thought that I was an 18-year-old studying English as a foreign language, either she's not the sharpest examiner around or my level of English is not what I thought it was. Or maybe I'm just a good actor, although I made no effort to come across as a rookie learner of the language, as the guy for whom I took the test clearly is.

Perhaps, seeing as how it must have been obvious to Laura that it wasn't an 18-year-old Colombian answering her questions, the oral exam will be declared invalid.

However, from what I gather, it's an accepted practice in certain quarters.

In essence, it's not that the student must pass the test. It's a case of — using, pertinently, English's passive voice — 'The test must be passed — by somebody, it doesn't matter who.'

Deep fake

Yes, I could have declined to take it for this guy whom I've never met. For one, the payment I received for doing it won't tempt me to dine in an exclusive Bogotá restaurant. It's barely enough for a roasted whole chicken in my working-class barrio.

Yet, curiosity got the better of my mild moral objections to this rather innocent fraud. If I hadn't done it, somebody else would have, no doubt.

What's more, if the guy was more tech-savvy, he probably could have set up ChatGPT or the like to do it for him. I'm quite behind the curve when it comes to the use of Artificial Intelligence, but from what I've heard and read, it would be up to such a task. In fact, I imagine an AI version of the student would have been a far more convincing fake than me.

Thus, with AI's overhauling of innumerable areas of human competence, Colombia's passive examination system is perhaps a better reflection of the times than what's considered best practice in other places.
__________________________________________________________
Listen to The Corrigan Cast podcast here.

Facebook: Wrong Way Corrigan — The Blog & IQuiz "The Bogotá Pub Quiz".

Tech it or leave it

@wwaycorrigan

[For an audio/vlog version of this story, click here.]

Back in my Gaelic (Irish) football-playing days, when the extent of strength and conditioning training was often little more than running and sprinting, I was quite the stickler for following the exact course of any run.

Tech-ache: The rules of engagement are constantly changing. 

For example, if we had to do laps of the field, I wouldn't cut corners — I'd stay outside the lines of the pitch, which was what we were meant to do. And it annoyed me when more laid-back teammates didn't follow these rules. Cheating so-and-sos.

If they happened to finish before me, I'd console myself with the belief that their disingenuous actions would work against them in the, um, long run. (And, quite literally, over longer distances this was usually the case. Or at least the short-cutters would generally finish behind me in such pursuits. It was a different story with sprints. I wasn't blessed with blistering speed.)

'Play up, play up and play the game'

My latent Catholic beliefs no doubt played a part in this mindset. The sinners would be punished for their devilish deeds. OK, they could confess and receive absolution but knowing the characters involved, I figured it was unlikely they'd fess up. 'Mine shall be the Kingdom of Heaven.'

It's one thing, though, being obedient and rules-bound in training. It's quite another to bring that attitude to a competitive game, where winning is everything and your opponents will do what they can to defeat you, including bending if not exactly breaking the rules of engagement. To paraphrase the Kenny Rogers classic, Coward of the County, sometimes you've got to play a little dirty to win.

Or, in a less violent sense, at times you've got to play the field as it is, not as it once was or as you'd like it to be. If not, defeat is inevitable. To avoid that outcome you either adapt to the new conditions or find a different game to play — if that latter option is possible and desirable.

This all resonates with me on various fronts. The most pertinent one is continuous technological advancements, particularly AI, artificial intelligence, in all its forms. For if I continue to play the content creation/multimedia game and dream of better results, there are tools I could use that would most likely enhance what I produce and boost the chances of growing my reach. Yep, still chasing those dragons.

'It's like a man going to battle with a bow and arrow even though some of the most advanced weaponry is at his disposal.'

Now, I've no intention of using AI to write blogs for me. Not only do I view that as beyond cheating — it'd be like a footballer replacing himself on the field with a potentially better robot clone — but it would also be counterproductive personally. I do, you might be shocked to learn, enjoy writing and I like to try to better myself at it, challenging and frustrating as it oftentimes is. In any case, no AI can write like Wrong Way, right?

Laptop lassitude

Where the latest creative technology can be of assistance to me, it seems, is in the making of vlog versions of my blogs. The means, I believe, already exist to make such videos slicker and more eye-catching without much extra effort compared to the crude ones I currently create for Spotify and YouTube. I just haven't dabbled in these means yet.

A general lack of enthusiasm to turn on my laptop these days plays its part. And this laptop lassitude is made more acute in Colombia's hot lands, so my current base of San Martín de los Llanos in the Meta department doesn't help in this regard. Plus, I lack a suitable office with a WiFi connection here — I find it hard to do computer work where I cook, eat and sleep. San Martín, though, is good for me in other ways, I must add.

With my smartphone, I can easily write anywhere. But creating videos requires laptop work. One has greater scope and precision working with a mouse and a bigger screen. Or at least it used to be the case that a computer or laptop was needed to make videos that require a degree of editing. Perhaps the latest smartphones and certain applications make video creation a breeze on phones now. I've had my device, a Motorola One, since 2019; practically a relic in 21st-century tech terms. But if it ain't broke . . .

At play, too, is my minimalist approach and general lack of interest in cutting-edge technology. I use only the apps and gadgets that have become next to essential for my modus operandi, no more, no less.

Nonetheless, to come back to the football field, while I'm still running laps to try to get in shape, most others in this game are working with the best strength and conditioning techniques available.

It's akin to a man going to battle with a bow and arrow even though some of the most advanced weaponry is at his disposal.

So, I either change the way I attack or choose to fight a different war. A blend of both might just be the best option right now.
__________________________________________________________
Listen to The Corrigan Cast podcast here.

Facebook: Wrong Way Corrigan — The Blog & IQuiz "The Bogotá Pub Quiz".

Fending off irrelevance in the Artificial Intelligence Age

@wwaycorrigan

[For an audio/vlog version of this story, click here.]

'I read an article the other day that explained just how bad alcohol can be for one's health. So I've decided not to read any more.'

Hopes of a life largely free of AI and Big Tech may be impossible in the coming years.

Yes, it's an old one. And if it were to be taken seriously, it's a prime example of shooting the messenger — if one with such a fondness for booze could actually aim accurately, that is.

Anyone able to think straight these days knows that drinking to excess is unlikely to lead to a long and healthy life. Ignoring uncomfortable truths does not make them go away.

Ignoring is bliss

Yet, not all uncomfortable truths are of direct personal concern so ignoring them may, somewhat paradoxically, improve one's overall health.

For example, some studies have shown that regularly consuming the news can be damaging to one's well-being. So while terrible things are happening all over the world, it's not always in our best interests to be aware of them, particularly if there's little to nothing we can do to make them better.

The counterargument is that the world is so interconnected these days that even a small positive action on our part could help to resolve a complex issue in some distant place. For example, deciding not to buy products from a particular company that is believed to engage in questionable practices or is ethically reprehensible. Nonetheless, to do such a deed doesn't mean one has to be engrossed in the news all the time.

It is said, too, that to have a more positive outlook on life it's important to surround oneself with positive people and to think positively. Seeing as how the majority of the news fed to us is negative, dining on it daily can't be good for our state of mind.

With total abstinence practically impossible for many of us, moderation is the goal — like it is for imbibing and many other guilty pleasures.

Disillusioned

While I find myself getting angry with the narrative of certain news items — see Living with unsettled and unsettling questions for an idea of some of those — stories about the rise of artificial intelligence often leave me feeling disillusioned.

Yes, AI comes with opportunities as well as challenges, yet I find myself drawn to its negative side. In general, this is to do with the possibility that AI will make billions of us largely irrelevant: irrelevant in our usefulness to society in any case.

In an April 2024 post, More artificial intelligence, less human intelligence, I wrote about some of my concerns in this whole area. In the intervening period, having happened upon a copy of Yuval Noah Harari's book 21 Lessons for the 21st Century, first published in 2018, my fears have only grown.

'Biotechnology will provide our sustenance far more economically, sufficiently, and environmentally friendly than antiquated agriculture. Rewild rurality, hack humanity.'

As I touched on in a February 2024 article, Merging a life vacation with a vocation, I often feel that studying Humanities at university and the subsequent career path I've followed have left me particularly vulnerable to the aforementioned irrelevance.

In less disillusioned moments, however, I do at least think about areas where AI and Big Tech are going to have a harder time dominating human life. Yet, the relief from such ruminating is only temporary.

Biochemical beings

Take sport and physical activity in general, for one. While sports, as it is for most sectors of life, already use a lot of tech, we still fall back on the raw emotions — the blood, sweat, and tears — that are triggered when humans compete. How can technology provide such real, raw thrills and thus satiate both the competitors and the spectators?

Well, if we are in essence nothing but biochemical beings ripe for manipulation by advanced algorithms, then real physical sport could become obsolete, replaced by virtual contests that push all the right emotional buttons, minus the bumps and bruises on the body. Or even just replaced by some pill that gives us those feelings.

But won't we need to at least exercise so we burn off the calories to stay in shape? Again, medical and technological advancements could see staying in shape become a simple process, with one's metabolism kept at an optimum rate to be physically healthy without having to do rigorous workouts. (We already have the fat-fighting drug semaglutide — sold under the brand names Ozempic, Rybelsus, and Wegovy — that is apparently working wonders for some heavier individuals.)

In that scenario, those of us who dream of returning to a simpler, self-sufficient life living off the land, may find that such a practice is deemed damaging to society as a whole. Biotechnology will provide our sustenance far more economically, sufficiently, and environmentally friendly than antiquated agriculture. Rewild rurality, hack humanity.

For the Luddites/Luddite lites amongst us, the need for some human toil in construction does look set to continue for a while longer. (Although, being based in Colombia and seeing manual labourers still doing a lot of heavy lifting, my thinking may be a bit skewed on this. In high-income nations, machines are doing more and more of these construction chores.)

Of course, it's impossible to predict to just what extent AI and technology will further take over our lives. The inexorable rise of the machines doesn't inevitably mean the downfall of most humans.

There is also the power issue at play: the machines don't run on fresh air alone. Not yet, anyway. So as long as they rely on human-controlled sources of energy — and data — to function, we shall still have a significant role to play (some of us, at least).

Whatever lies ahead, we should focus on fixing and improving things in our present lives, as much as we can, that is.

Future issues are unlikely to trouble us if we can't get a handle on today's problems. We can ignore the unsettling news all we want but this doesn't make it disappear. Merely wishing it away is sure to accelerate our own demise.
__________________________________________________________
Listen to The Corrigan Cast podcast here.

Facebook: Wrong Way Corrigan — The Blog & IQuiz "The Bogotá Pub Quiz".

More artificial intelligence, less human intelligence

@wwaycorrigan

[For an audio/vlog version of this story, click here.]

While not officially a mechanic, my father is fairly well-versed in the workings of the combustible engine, its accompanying components and other such machines.

'You can leave your brain at reception. It's not needed here.'

In the rural Ireland of his youth, the sight of a car was a memorable event. Thus, being more technical than academic — the latter wasn't really open to him in any case — he was drawn to discover how these mesmerising motors operated. From what I've witnessed, many of his peers from similar backgrounds did likewise.

In this earlier phase in the rise of the machines, it seems the desire to understand the transformative technology was widespread.

That the rate of change was slower and physically more in one's face, so to put it, this inclination to educate oneself about the new developments made much sense. Even Luddites had a decent grasp of what they were opposing.

AI kills the radio and video stars

Today's more rapid change, occurring in what is a largely intangible ethersphere, even for netizens, has left many of us in the dark about the workings of the digital devices driving our daily interactions.

When problems arise, as they invariably do, one is unlikely to have a DIY solution, outside of a reboot or the more drastic factory reset. And, as most will know only too well, many digital difficulties, online obstacles, require a fix far more convoluted than an unassisted system restart.

In my November 2022 piece, The digital dystopia, I wrote about some of these tech troubleshooting travesties.

'Large language models aren't quite at the stage where they can churn out Churchillian-style rhetoric but, by all accounts, they can come up with bread-and-butter prose satisfactorily.'

Now, with the inexorable advance of artificial intelligence (AI), not only are many of us ignorant about the nuts and bolts that put it together, but its raison d'être is to do the majority of thinking for us.

Rather than go through the hassle of doing strenuous study, racking your brain, AI will rake the internet for you and come up with a satisfying solution almost instantly.

So on the artificial face of it, life will be less arduous.

In my line of work — if I can be said to have one — the need for human editors and proofreaders will greatly diminish, nay already is diminishing.

Grammarly and the like have been aiding writers for the last number of years. Such grammar software is far from perfect but it's improving rapidly. (As Grammarly currently is, I wager that it's better than the average native English speaker at spotting grammatical errors.)

If Grammarly is taking the place of the real-life editor or, worse still, the need for one to grasp basic grammar, ChatGPT and its competitors are doing away with the need to be able to write in the first instance. Again, these large language models (LLMs) aren't quite at the stage where they can churn out Churchillian-style rhetoric — who amongst us can? — but, by all accounts, they can come up with bread-and-butter prose satisfactorily.

I imagine that LLMs will do — perhaps already are doing — a lot of the heavy lifting in compiling TV/radio news bulletins and suchlike. Heck, this might even tempt me back to the newsroom! (Refer to my piece Making the bell toll for us while we still can for more on my previous newsroom nightmares. The DJ-3000 from The Simpsons episode Bart Gets an Elephant, first aired on 31 March 1994, also comes to mind here!)

As for learning a foreign language, this could become obsolete save for those who have a special interest in it. Surely, in the very near future, Google Translate will be viewed as a caveman-like tool for communicating in a non-native tongue. 'What, back in the early 2020s you still largely tried to speak a foreign language?'

Active intelligence

With all of these AI tools, one can try to be an active, inquisitive user. I mean active here in the sense of not merely accepting uncritically the AI answers. For example, coming back to grammar, if it suggests a correction, one should at least know why it's doing so.

In this way, one can also learn. The rise of AI doesn't have to signal Armageddon for humans — or at least Armageddon for the use of one's critical faculties.

While engines and motors rendered certain lines of employment redundant, it can be argued that they paved the way for today's health and fitness industry. Work for many of us may be more sedentary now compared to previous generations, yet we still seek physical stimulation — be that simulation or real. And machines have certainly helped bring about mass tourism, problematic as that has become all the same.

Similarly, AI comes with opportunities and challenges. Some academics and experts fear it has far more of the latter. For sure, it is set to be more intimately disruptive in the lives of every one of us compared to previous technological advancements.

With that in mind, should refusing to engage with AI become next to impossible, trying to ensure that we remain in control of it rather than it controlling us, is key.

Keeping well informed and as much in the know as possible is a start. The overall direction of travel, though, suggests we're entering an AI Bright Age, with a new Dark Age for human intelligence.
__________________________________________________________
Listen to The Corrigan Cast podcast here.

Facebook: Wrong Way Corrigan — The Blog & IQuiz "The Bogotá Pub Quiz".