Sunday 24 June 2012

A matter of protection

There is that old adage that ‘the best things in life are free’. In a number of ways, this still holds true, depending, of course, on your preferences. 

For example, you can have a refreshing, relaxing walk in the open countryside, engage in a trek up a mountain or spend some quality time with family and friends. In most scenarios these things should cost you little or nothing yet empower your body and mind. 

Condoms - the safest way to go?
It's called 'Plan B', below, for a reason. Go with 'Plan A', above, first.
Some people, naively, like to throw sexual intercourse into this category. OK, in its basic natural form, in the actual moment, love-making is free (for another take on ‘free’ love see: http://bit.ly/MtWh7T). That is, if you’re doing it unprotected. But there are many obvious inherent risks in such practices — all of which have the potential to come with a hefty price down the line.

The Emergency Contraceptive - sailing very close to the wind
For several men, in a time when, it can be argued, the contraceptive options for our female counterparts are more plentiful, it is more desirable to opt for unprotected sex. It’s more natural. Fumbling around with a condom is, pun intended, a bit of a stretch. 

There’s the belief that women’s contraception is less interfering in the love-making process yet far more effective. That, indeed, may be true from a birth-control point of view. However, if you are the sleeping-around type, you can never be too well protected when it comes to sexually transmitted infections (STIs).

Outside of that, though, leaving all the responsibility to avoid an unwanted pregnancy on one side is not alone taking a big chance, but it’s also very foolish and selfish. If you do the crime — or play a significant part in it — then you should be prepared to do the time. Or at least contribute towards ‘fixing’ things. 

Plus, you can never be fully certain as to what your partner’s desires are, regardless as to whether it is a casual or more long-term relationship. Playing things ultra-safe is always the best option in this regard.
 
Because with casual, unprotected sex can come unplanned, unwanted, pregnancies. 

If this happens to become your fate i.e. due to a lack of responsibility you’re facing becoming a father before you’re really ready, the options are stark for you and your ‘accomplice’. Let nature take its course or abort. Neither can be taken lightly — indeed, as you know, the latter choice is not easily or readily available to all.

From a man’s perspective, especially one not wishing to become a father, abortion is often seen as the least-bad option. From the woman’s side, we can only imagine it leaves both physical and psychological scares. 

We haven’t, though, mentioned the third party in all of this. For those in the pro-life camp the most fundamental aspect: the developing embryo. From a biological perspective, it can be hard to argue against the belief that once the sex cells have successfully fused, the initial sparks of life emerge.

Picture Joke - not intended to cause offence
So, as a result of two people’s lazy, irresponsible actions a new life can be created when it could have been, in most cases, prevented. 

Yes, in such circumstances, it may be better for all involved, including the unborn, to terminate the pregnancy before it gets a chance to fully develop. 

A child should, after all and where possible, be born into a loving relationship with both father and mother accepting responsibility. Problems tend to emerge where this is lacking — although, we must state, not always. 

What all this essentially boils down to is the advice from one of the oldest sayings in the book. Prevention is better than cure. 

If that proves too difficult a task, then the following may come into play: 'If you’re sowing your wild oats at night, pray for crop failure in the morning.'

4 comments:

  1. "From a man’s perspective, especially one not wishing to become a father, abortion is often seen as the least-worst option. From the woman’s side, we can only imagine it perhaps can leave both physical and psychological scares. We haven’t though mentioned the third party in all of this."

    So your premise is, for a man who doesn't want to become a father, abortion is the best option. For a woman, she has to live with the scars and for the child... well, he/she just doesn't get to live at all!

    Looks like the man is the winner in the scenario! He gets to walk away, unscathed. The child is dead, the woman is scarred.

    As someone who was conceived in less than ideal circumstances, I value my life. Who are you to decide that I and many more like me, are unworthy of life? I am a mother and one day, I hope to be a grandmother. My children value my life too. How many of us walking around today, were also conceived in less than salubrious surroundings, in less than perfectly planned circumstances! Get real Mr. Corrigan. Human beings make mistakes but no human being is a mistake! Every life is precious, no matter what the circumstances of conception, or birth, or ability, or gender, or race, or sexual orientation.
    I would bet if I asked you, you would say you were against animal cruelty?? Yet you can sit there and pontificate about the right to tear an innocent child, limb from limb and vacuum it from it's mother's womb! That is the reality of abortion. You can call it termination or whatever other term you wish, but that is the harsh reality!




    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "As someone who was conceived in less than ideal circumstances, I value my life. Who are you to decide that I and many more like me, are unworthy of life?"

      I never wrote or said that I decide who is worthy of life or not.

      What I wrote on 'The Irish Times' website, as I believe you read, quoted and responded to, is that if a woman who is impregnated with a child that she does not want, especially so if that child was conceived during unwanted sex (rape), wants to terminate that pregnancy, then I believe the mechanisms to do that should be available to her.

      If we take another angle on your argument, let's just say I decide to go around and rape a load of women and impregnate them all, all those foetuses should be given the right to live even if their mother & father want nothing to do with them..?

      Delete
  2. Yes, that is exactly what I believe. I think that the women you raped should see you, their rapist, put behind bars where you belong, but in our justice system, the chances of that happening are very slim. Most rape victims don't report, of those who do, very few are brought to trial and of those brought to trial, very few are convicted. That speaks volumes about the attitude of our society to the protection of women.
    When a child is conceived, something happens to a woman's body, a natural protectiveness towards her child occurs which may be overshadowed by guilt, or fear, or shame. Nevertheless, it is there. Rape is an abomination, second only to abortion in my opinion. The consolation for the victim is if some good comes out of the awfulness of it, i.e. a son/daughter. I have yet to meet a mother who regretted giving birth, no matter what the circumstances of conception. I have met many women whose lives have been irreparably damaged by abortion. Abortion brings a lifetime of regret. Two wrongs never make a right.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Please be careful with how you word things, it sounds like you're calling me a rapist at the start!

    In a few words, my point is that it's a personal choice and very much rests with the mother. If somebody truly, truly does not want to carry a foetus - perhaps may be even suicidal - then if the means is there to grant what she wants, let her do it.

    It may not perhaps be a 'wrong' for her. You can't generally say that every woman would regret having an abortion.

    ReplyDelete