Hold tight, the worst is yet to come

@wwaycorrigan

[Listen to an audio version of this blog entry here.]

If you've ever listened to and/or read the work of Canadian cognitive psychologist, linguist, and popular-science author, Steven Pinker, you'll know that he's been at pains to tell us, replete with facts and figures, that as a species we've never had it so good.

In countries such as Colombia, a post-pandemic boom is hard to envisage.

Wild West

Life expectancy is up across the globe, child mortality levels have never been lower, there are fewer devastating wars, the list of positive indicators, when looked at over time, is practically endless.

Indeed, even the millions, nay billions, who have been spooked into believing that covid-19 — that is to say the infection caused by the coronavirus, not the highly questionable, damaging measures introduced to curtail contagion — is an 'unprecedented threat' need only look back at history to realise that as pandemics go, we've got off lightly.

In fact, as many high-income nations marvel at the rapid rollout of their vaccination programmes and with it a decline in hospitalisations/deaths linked to covid-19 — cause-and-effect questions aside — talk is shifting in some quarters to a roaring twenties for the 21st century, akin to what some countries experienced in the 1920s after World War One ended and the Spanish flu petered out.

Yes, it is true that practically everyone has been disrupted in some form due to lockdowns and a halting of what was once called "normal life". 

However, it would appear many in the comfortable classes who have been able to continue working and earning throughout the pandemic largely as before — a prolonged home office being the main change — have boosted their cash reserves. And now, green light pending, they're ready to splurge.

It is also true that most countries have increased their debt burden in order to keep their economies ticking over after having shut down a host of finance-generating activities. (That debt does have to be paid back, doesn't it? Or is it just numbers on a page? Or a stick to continuously beat the masses with? 'Time to tighten your belts again, guys.')

Whatever the case, hope exists that with post-pandemic elation, we'll spend our way into a boom.

That's the optimistic take. Yet, as hard as Steven Pinker et al. try to convince us otherwise, the age-old human tendency to believe that the current epoch is the worst, that the apocalypse is nigh, is unlikely to lessen in intensity.

On the contrary, the indicators are that the opposite will happen.

I say this because of a vociferous, activist and, importantly, influential group of largely affluent people from the global West that sees virtually everything associated with Western values and its way of life as the root of all our problems. 

The fact that their own comfortable existence, nay their existence at all, is thanks to the West's achievements doesn't seem to register.

Now, I must state that I'm all for correcting what we recognise as bad practices. Materialism and its disposable, waste-heavy living tend to bring out the worst in human behaviour. Finding truly sustainable, reliable energy sources to continue to drive positive advancements is not just worthwhile, it's essential.

However, those West-is-evil virtue signallers tend to be spectacular hypocrites. 'Everything must change, except us.' 

They thrive off an alarmist agenda, convince themselves that they're doing their bit to save humanity/the planet, safe in the knowledge that they'll never have to face the real consequences of finding that delicate balance between progress and sustainability, between life and death.

'It very much feels like a rather open, liberal period is giving way to one that is quite the opposite.'

That the worst is yet to come is due to what I see as the pursuing of a regressive agenda, one that if implemented would actually deepen the divide between the haves and have nots. A case of, 'everything's been built on false premises, tear it all down and start again.'

To give such an approach its due, the argument can be made that there would indeed be a temporary decline while we readjust to new ways but we'd soon power on again, cleaner, greener and leaner.

Changing times

Staying largely positive, take the following observation from the epilogue of J.M. Roberts' mammoth The Penguin History of the World, 1997 reprint:

'There are still no reasons to believe that the ways of discovering techniques to meet problems in the past cannot again be brought to bear successfully. We have no grounds either logical or empirical for thinking that the steady accretion of control over nature which has marked all history until now will not continue. All that is different is that change is quite simply more sweeping and faster than ever before. But this applies to the search for solutions as well as to the emergence of problems.

We know of nothing in the nature of the problems now facing the human race which in principle renders them incapable of solution. They may be more urgent and potentially more damaging, but this is only to say that their solution may require more urgent and radical methods, more drastic political and social change, not that they are insoluble.

We may have to decide to live in a different way, but we need not assume mankind will be extinguished ... We have plenty of evidence of human adaptability in the past. The only clear warning which does stand out is that, whatever we do, we are likely to be gravely misled about the future if we simply extrapolate present trends. We must prepare for discontinuity as well as continuity.'

How continuity and discontinuity manifest themselves will be the key to success. Or failure. For me, the signs are not good.

It very much feels like a rather open, liberal period is giving way to one that is quite the opposite.

This brings to mind the remarks of Steppenwolf in Herman Hesse's classic novel of the same name, worthy of being reprinted in full here:

'Every age, every culture, every custom and tradition has its own character, its own weakness and its own strength, its beauties and ugliness; accepts certain sufferings as matters of course, puts up patiently with certain evils. Human life is reduced to real suffering, to hell, only when two ages, two cultures and religions overlap. A man of the Classical Age who had to live in medieval times would suffocate miserably just as a savage does in the midst of our civilisation.

Now there are times when a whole generation is caught in this way between two ages, two modes of life, with the consequence that it loses all power to understand itself and has no standard, no security, no simple acquiescence. Naturally, everyone does not feel this equally strongly. A nature such as Nietzsche's had to suffer our present ills more than a generation in advance. What he had to go through alone and misunderstood, thousands suffer today.'

It certainly appears that some people seem intent on ensuring that suffering is a widespread constant. In an Orwellian sense, suffering is joy. Indeed.
_______________________________________________________________
Listen to Wrong Way's Colombia Cast podcast here.

Facebook: Wrong Way Corrigan — The Blog & IQuiz "The Bogotá Pub Quiz".

 

Calling out the keyboard warriors

@wwaycorrigan

[Listen to an audio version of this blog entry here.]

'The pen is mightier than the sword.'

It could be said that when this was first coined — by English author Edward Bulwer-Lytton in 1839 — those who preferred the pen over the sword still had to know how to handle themselves physically. The risk was ever-present that they might be challenged to a bout of fisticuffs as a result of what they wrote.

To the battle station ... (Photo from pexels.com.)

Soft hands

Even if they never had to take a punch, their lives back then were much less comfortable and involved an amount of slogging compared to many of their equivalents today. 

These are namely the smug, do-gooder hacks who pontificate to the masses they claim to "understand" from a safe distance and the ubiquitous keyboard warriors.

While one could perhaps excuse some — some, that is — journalists for acting in good faith, there is less room for forgiveness for those who spend hours trolling on social media, save from them not actually having a real social life.

This latter cohort's main purpose is to attack and belittle. They rarely if ever have anything informative to say.

'Social media has provided them with a platform to overcome their many shortcomings in physically interacting with Homo sapiens.'

And why not when they tend not to face any real consequences for their actions? It's safe to assume that if they were dragged out from their virtual undergrowth to debate in a real-life public space they'd be rather different, less pugnacious characters.

One can picture the types. Mollycoddled individuals, constantly told how wonderful they are by their parents whilst getting everything handed to them. Social media have provided them with a platform to overcome their many shortcomings in physically interacting with Homo sapiens, allowing them to engage where otherwise they would simply be dismissed and ignored.

Of course, one can simply refuse to interact with them on their terms in the first instance. Give the dog a bone and all that.

However, at times, it's difficult to avoid being lured in to their virtual combat. Also, for a brief period, it can be fun. The problem is, if you go down the rabbit hole, it can take an amount of mental effort to find a way out. It's usually not worth it.

Thus, the best strategy is not to enter in the first place.

As I've said before, social media are mere tools; addictive they can be, but tools they are nonetheless. Ultimate power rests with the user.

Engage if needs be — and in many industries, social media have become indispensable in order to gain a competitive advantage or to remain "relevant" — but engage on your terms.

The pen and the sword, after all, are only as effective as the people wielding them. There's a time to write and there's a time to get out and "fight".
_______________________________________________________________
Listen to Wrong Way's Colombia Cast podcast here.

Facebook: Wrong Way Corrigan — The Blog & IQuiz "The Bogotá Pub Quiz".

 

Santandercito, keeping the satiated dullness at bay

@wwaycorrigan

[Listen to an audio version of this blog entry here.]

I've stated previously how I'm not at all averse to routine, as long as I feel it's not too detrimental to my health and well-being.

Bogotá's Santandercito: Rough and ready.

Downwardly mobile

On the other hand, I've also let it be known that a monotonous 8-6 gig is not for me. While I might be traversing the same physical ground on a daily basis — something most of the world has been forced to do for much of the last 16 months — the important thing is that there's an amount of variety to what I'm doing.

Of course, 'being my own boss', as I pretty much am these days, means I put as much variety into what I do as I see fit, constrained both financially and legally as we all are to varying degrees.

Throughout the pandemic, however, 'spicing up one's life' has been rather difficult. It may be one explanation as to why I've found myself being pulled right into Bogotá barrio living. That is, not just socialising in my stomping ground of Santandercito but actually taking up residence there.

Yes, my living quarters are far from ideal. And lest people say 'you get what you pay for, tight-fisted Corrigan', I'm forking out the most I've ever had to for accommodation during my almost ten years in Bogotá.

'A period of small-town living might be the answer to some issues I've been largely ignoring to address. Mentally recharge and evaluate my options from, quite literally, a different viewpoint.'

My main bugbears are a lack of natural light entering and the noise from above. I'm on the ground floor while the landlady and her extended family occupy the other two floors. A two-metre squared open space from the plastic roof down projects some light into my living space. 

It also, unfortunately, ensures I hear all the chattering and regular shouting from above as if I were actually in the same room as my noisy neighbours. Kids, who'd have 'em, eh?

Unsettling issues

Some say that for the rent I pay I could find something better. In Bogotá, for a place that's largely independent and contract-free, I'm not so sure. I might find an apartment with better natural lighting but it would probably be lacking in something else. I've moved around the city enough to know that's it hard to get past mediocrity, such is life.  

That aside, there's a certain energy on the streets that I feed off. Even in the "strictest" days of coronavirus-containment measures, there was a bit of welcome life about the place.

Now, as a resident, I get a mild buzz wandering through the barrio and greeting the various folk I know. Some are just familiar faces, no more than acquaintances, others are people I regard as good friends.

To borrow from the renowned clinical psychologist and best-selling author Jordan B. Peterson, my opting to take up residence here could be linked to a shunning of the 'satiated dullness' of a comfortable existence. (Peterson said this in relation to Fyodor Dostoevsky's critique of the socialist utopia, so a rather different context. Having said that, I found nothing dull about Venezuela's, um, "socialist utopia". Also, I'm not so sure how and where I could find a comfortable existence these days.)

It must be noted, though, the location hasn't that much to do with living comfortably or not, financially speaking in any case.

Nonetheless, as Bogotá is due to start roaring again like it did pre-pandemic, a more relaxed existence could be found outside the metropolis. For I can't say that I'm currently in Bogotá for the money really. Far from it. Indeed, it could be said the small amount I earn is offset by a somewhat hedonistic lifestyle, at times anyway.

A period of small-town living might be the answer to some issues I've been largely ignoring to address. Mentally recharge, evaluate my options from, quite literally, a different viewpoint, before facing into another stay-or-go dilemma with a visa expiry date only months away.

There really never is a dull moment in this unsettled existence, is there?
_______________________________________________________________
Listen to Wrong Way's Colombia Cast podcast here.

Facebook: Wrong Way Corrigan — The Blog & IQuiz "The Bogotá Pub Quiz".

The Colombian compromise

@wwaycorrigan

[Listen to an audio version of this blog entry here.]

'There are decades where nothing happens, and there are weeks where decades happen.'

That famous observation, attributed, rightly or wrongly, to Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov — better known as Lenin to most of us — has been used to describe many situations over the years.

Lame ducks: President Iván Duque & Vice President Marta Lucía Ramírez. (Photo from presidencia.gov.co.)

Plus ça change

Some might be tempted to apply it to what's been happening in Colombia of late.

The truth of it is, however, that despite the ongoing protests — linked, it must be remembered, to a movement that started on 27 November 2019, so not quite a matter of just a few weeks — nothing much has changed in the country, the pandemic effects excepted.

Indeed, so far the protesters' main achievements have been to stop things from happening. No to the proposed tax and health reforms, no to the co-hosting of the Copa América.

What's more, calls for police and military reform have been heard from Colombians since before the new constitution of 1991. Like that of the perennial tax-reform debate that only ever really trims around the edges at best, we're still waiting.

While there does appear to be broad agreement that there's something more lasting to the current protests, that those taking to the streets won't go away without concrete commitments to change, in a country that, officially speaking, displays a deep respect for "due process" through the courts, rapid, radical overhauls are most unlikely.

'There is a Colombian tradition of finding a workable solution to an impasse without completely ripping up the script.'

Of course, in a number of respects, this is a good thing. Throwing away the existing rule book when it's not at all clear what would follow could go disastrously wrong. Nonetheless, there are many who say, justifiably, that that existing rule book only really serves the interests of a comfortable minority.

'Hay un camino'

That being said, there is a Colombian tradition of finding a workable solution to an impasse without completely ripping up the script. The Colombian compromise we could call it. (One could argue that the new constitution of 1991 was the wrong solution at the right time, change for change's sake.)

I've experienced this compromise for day-to-day affairs while there are also "grander" historical examples (the Frente Nacional, to name but one). It might require a questionable interpretation of the rules or the turning of a blind eye but the idea is that all parties walk away feeling they've achieved something.

For now, for the current bungling administration headed by President Iván Duque, the hope must be that it can tap into that old Colombian trait. As Venezuela's former presidential candidate Henrique Caprile's campaign slogan went, 'Hay un camino', there is a way (alas, for him, he's still looking for that 'way').

It's both a blessing and a curse for Duque that his term ends in just over a year, August 2022. The blessing, in theory anyway, is that he can be more flexible in ceding to various demands safe in the knowledge that they'll get tied up in Colombia's Byzantine bureaucracy. In that scenario, when he leaves office, he could say: 'Hey, I did try in the end. It's out of my hands now.'

The curse is that it appears the majority of Colombians wish he wasn't president. There is zero trust in him in many quarters.

Furthermore, the unspectacular but largely positive change Colombia has experienced over the last couple of decades has now, understandably, only led to a desire for greater, quicker change amongst its younger citizens.

They know what they want — in a general sense in any case — and they want it now, in a number of weeks, not in a decade or two.

Step forward the Colombian compromise.
_______________________________________________________________
Listen to Wrong Way's Colombia Cast podcast here.

Facebook: Wrong Way Corrigan — The Blog & IQuiz "The Bogotá Pub Quiz".

 

The quieter side of Bogotá

@wwaycorrigan

[Listen to an audio version of this blog entry here.]

For somebody who likes to get away from the hustle and bustle of city life, to discover new, more tranquil settings, having not left the greater environs of Bogotá for over 15 months has been far from ideal.

Beautiful Bogotá: At least from these vantage points!

Indeed, how I haven't completely cracked up is perhaps puzzling (although some will say I have, at least on occasions).

Blissful Bogotá

Part of the secret in keeping me relatively sane — outside of moving house regularly — has been my making the most of the spots of serenity Bogotá does have available.

Most will find that statement a paradox: spots of serenity in Bogotá? Well, they do exist.

The first of those that became my retreat in the middle of 2020 is the area behind the rough-and-ready barrio of El Codito.

While many would advise against a non-resident walking up through El Codito, I haven't had any issues traversing its many steep, narrow steps. This is part of the attraction, the pumping of the legs needed to get beyond the bustling barrio and into loftier, quieter territory. I'm not fully certain of the altitude at the higher points but I'd wager they reach about 3000 metres-above-sea-level, 400 metres above the Bogotá mean.

That settlement behind El Codito, taking the 185th Street to the turn-off for La Capilla and beyond — actually officially leaving Bogotá and crossing into the municipality of La Calera — gives you a sense of being in the countryside yet with a sprawling metropolis in full view.

It's not completely serene. There's always the chance of an aggressive dog or two spoiling the walk but at least the air feels fresher with more greenery about than in the grey, uninspiring concrete jungle below.

There is also a pleasant trek from La Capilla, along the mountain ridge, to Santa Cecilia, the hillside barrio with brightly painted houses that, when viewed from a distance, collectively resemble a butterfly.

'There's even a generously branched tree or two enticing one to climb. I felt like a child again!'

I only walked that route once, on a relatively busy Sunday. Why I haven't returned is largely down to the fact that I've been told it's a "popular" spot for thieves. A lone wanderer would be a bit exposed and isolated in the event of an unwanted encounter. Oh well, nothing's perfect.

''Cerro" distraction

There are no such concerns on the direct opposite side to El Codito and Santa Cecilia, namely Cerro de la Conejera on Bogotá's north-western limits.

This is the hill that meets you when you take the partially closed-to-traffic 183rd Street to its conclusion. The fact that it's home to the Antares Naval Club probably plays a part in keeping it free from "undesirables".

The gentle climb up the road to the club's entrance is popular with cyclists, offering a nice workout as it does. I'm guessing it's at least a 200-metre ascent.

The best bit, though, about this hill is going off-road, where the cyclists can't really go. About 100 metres before the club gates, there's a path into the woods. This breaks up into various interconnected trails. A ten-to-fifteen-minute wander in and you'll get views of the flat land leading to the town of Cota further west, tucked away in the foothills of another mountain range. To the north, you can see Chía.

There's even a generously branched tree or two enticing one to climb. I felt like a child again! When the sun shines, there are a few uncovered spots that catch the rays, allowing for some tanning/burning should one be that way inclined.

I've done this walk on two occasions thus far and each time I met nobody — I was completely on my own. Not even a canine — crazy or otherwise — in sight, a rarity for Colombia.

Both times were Fridays, so it might be different at weekends, perhaps there are more people about then. I must wander up some Sunday to see what it's like — Sunday being the day when practically all of Bogotá tends to get out to do some form of exercise or activity.  

Whatever the case, I'm more than happy to have it to myself midweek. These little spots of serenity together with the never-dull barrio living help to keep one 'in the game', so to put it, in these strange, troubling times.
_______________________________________________________________
Listen to Wrong Way's Colombia Cast podcast here.

Facebook: Wrong Way Corrigan — The Blog & IQuiz "The Bogotá Pub Quiz".

 

Colombia: A system failure

@wwaycorrigan

[Listen to an audio version of this blog entry here.]

The chaotic times Colombia is experiencing bring to mind just how inflexible a presidential system can be.

Back me or sack me

Faced with such a crisis in a parliamentary democracy, a motion of no confidence would most likely be tabled against the prime minister. 

If there was enough dissent in government ranks, the ruling party could lose such a vote. That would trigger, barring a new arrangement amongst the parties in parliament to choose a new premier, an election.

Widespread protests are ongoing in Colombia.

Either that or the prime minister, in a put-up-or-shut-up cry to the electorate, could call an election of his/her own accord. (In the Irish system, this would need to be signed off on by the largely ceremonial president, something that is normally just a matter of course.)

Think of Boris Johnson's sweeping victory in the UK's December 2019 general election. Having won the support of his party to take over as PM from Theresa May with a more hard-line Brexit position, he put it all on the line and went to the country in a bid to strengthen his mandate. 

It worked, quite stunningly. The many loud, influential voices against the Conservative leader had to grudgingly accept that the British electorate backed Boris.

Of the various demands from Colombia's protesters, some are calling for the resignation of President Iván Duque. As I mentioned in my previous post, with an election for a new head of state just 12 months away, it's unlikely in the extreme that this will happen.

However, I wonder if Duque right now wishes he was a prime minister in a parliamentary system where he could call a snap election. 

It would certainly put to the test the belief, particularly seen in international media, that the current protests are widely supported. (I must add, while Duque's own popularity appears on the floor, his party, Centro Democrático, still has a solid support base. If we can call the Centro Democrático the party in power, the opposition is far from united — it's quite a mixed bag.)

My take on it, from my humble estrato dos abode in the far north of Bogotá, is a little more nuanced.

Of course the many struggling to make ends meet want to see their lot improve. Don't we all? The killing of innocent protesters by state forces is also wholly unacceptable. Most Colombians would appear to agree that some sort of police reform is badly needed.

However, as I've written oft-times before, the more radical, mostly younger forces that appear to make up the majority of the protesters aren't exactly lovingly embraced by your average barrio-popular resident.

Unsurprisingly, there is a certain arrogance amongst the leftist, university-attending protesters towards those not of their ilk. 'The uneducated idiots don't know what's good for them' is a regular refrain.

'Is it a case that the majority of Colombians feel they're somewhere in the middle and relatively content with that?'

It's a standard line of attack by those on the left. It rarely works. In fact, it's often counterproductive.

Who are these "educated" folk to say that the construction worker or housecleaner doesn't know what he/she wants?

Colombians don't have to look too far to find an example of what can go horribly wrong when a country takes a hard turn to the left based on promises to end corruption and bring about a better life for all. Venezuela, anyone?

OK, some of you will say I'm being dramatic here. That what the protesters are really calling for is simply a fairer system, a reduction in inequality, not a version of Hugo Chávez Frías' socialism for the 21st century.

The price of fairness

In terms of some of the standout demands on the protesters' list — a guaranteed one month's minimum wage for those officially living in poverty and no university tuition fees — it's true that we're not talking about unrealistic proposals when viewed from an international perspective. 

In fact, President Duque has already announced the introduction of free, temporary for the moment albeit, public higher education for students from the lowest three strata (for a brief introduction to the strata system, see https://wwcorrigan.blogspot.com/2014/10/end-of-strata-republic.html).

All such measures, to state the obvious, must be paid for somehow. In Ireland, my home country, a relatively generous social welfare system and "free" third-level education for undergraduates is financed by redistributing wealth through what one might call "progressive" taxes. 

There are always the complaints that the richest in society aren't contributing enough and, on the other extreme, some people are just scrounging off the state.

Colombia, I'm guessing, would have to do something similar in terms of taxation. What might worry some who consider themselves to be just making ends meet, however, is that they would be asked to contribute more than they currently are to fund an expanded social welfare state. In other words, in a Colombian context, they're not as poor as they think they are.

In a country where informal, unregulated employment and illegality — officially uncontrolled and outlawed by the state but unofficially approved — are commonplace and "suffice" for many involved in such activities, rocking the system is a risk they are reluctant to take.

It remains to be seen if the proposals to significantly expand Colombia's welfare state make any real headway. By their very nature, they would require more government control in a country where there is much mistrust of state institutions. Colombia, do remember, tends to move to a conservative, raw-capitalist beat.

Without completely tearing down the house, in common with the social-democratic countries in Northern Europe, those looking for wholesale changes might find that a parliamentary system is the best vehicle to implement them.

They might also find, though, that they haven't as much support as they may believe they have.

No system is perfect. Each one has its losers and winners. Is it a case that the majority of Colombians feel they're somewhere in the middle and relatively content with that? 

On the other hand, there is the nothing-ventured-nothing-gained argument. Deciphering the amount of change needed, or not as the case may be, is a delicate balance.

Future elections, the candidates that go forward and the manifestos they present will give us some indication of where 'el pueblo colombiano' stands on all this.
_______________________________________________________________
Listen to Wrong Way's Colombia Cast podcast here.

Facebook: Wrong Way Corrigan — The Blog & IQuiz "The Bogotá Pub Quiz".

 

Colombia, between a rock and a hard place

@wwaycorrigan

[Listen to an audio version of this blog entry here.]

'Hey Johnny, what are you rebelling against?'
'Whaddaya got?'
 
Some of you will recognise those lines from a classic scene in the 1953 US crime film The Wild One, with Marlon Brando playing protagonist Johnny Strabler. It was parodied, for those of us of a much younger age, some 40 years later in The Simpsons by Lisa (taking Johnny's role) and Principal Skinner.

Protesters block Bogotá's Autopista Norte.

A taxing issue

Not wanting to make light of the very real issues at the heart of the latest wave of protests in Colombia, in some ways it seems as if the protesters are against pretty much anything the state represents. One could say, much rhetoric, little real detail.

The spark that led to this so-called Paro Nacional, National Strike, was the controversial tax reform proposals. While many other grievances were highlighted by the various organisations officially behind the mobilisation that started on 28 April, it seems unlikely that the movement would have garnered as much support if it hadn't been for these mooted tax changes. (It must be said, the numbers protesting in recent days aren't massive by any means but they are causing widespread disruption via roadblocks, damage to public transport and such like.)

Across the class spectrum, there was widespread anger at the Ministry of Finance's proposals. It matters little whether this anger has been justified or not. The narrative was set that the government was looking to take more than was fair from the middle and lower classes to increase its revenues, something it badly needs to do.

For one, looking to widen the income tax base, as these proposals did, doesn't seem too unreasonable in a country where a small percentage of the population actually contributes in this way. Nonetheless, when state politicians earn about 30 times the national minimum wage and there's a belief that corruption is commonplace among the controlling classes and wealthier folk, asking the masses to fork out more in such a blatant manner was always going to be met with resistance.

'Taking it as a given that it's Colombia's centre-left/left behind most of this, if there was a presidential election next week, one would be taking a significant gamble betting on politicians from that side of the spectrum to be poll toppers.'

In the end, President Iván Duque's administration capitulated. The Finance Minister resigned and the tax reform proposals have been binned. They'll be back in some form again as the country must find ways to raise revenues (or cut spending) — my podcast interview from last year with the renowned economist Leopoldo Fergusson gives a good overview of the situation together with some considered ideas of what could be done.

So with the tax reform proposals shelved, the minister responsible sent packing and President Duque promising an inclusive national dialogue, why have the protests continued? (They are into day nine as I write.)

Police state

The biggest reason is the response of state security forces. Depending on whose figures you believe, we've had either over 20 protest-related deaths or over 30. Culpability for the majority of these has been laid squarely at the police and individuals acting on their behalf. In this age where social media dominates the discourse, deciphering fact from fiction is difficult, to say the least.

All this follows on from previous protest fatalities, the most recent spate occurring in Bogotá in September 2020 when violence erupted after the death at the hands of police of Javier Ordóñez, something I wrote about at the time.

This time around it's the south-western city of Cali that has borne the brunt of killings and violence, although all major urban centres in the country have seen some level of violent disturbances.

Thus, protesters' ire is yet again directed at police brutality. Each morning since 28 April we've woken up to news of another killing allegedly at the hands of state forces. As long as that continues, the chances of the protests petering out, as has happened previously, seem low.

The official organisers of the National Strike are scheduled to meet with government officials in the coming days. Whether this will result in an easing of tensions remains to be seen.

How much the various workers' unions are actually in control of the movement at this stage is highly debatable.

For many of the younger protesters, it would seem that nothing short of President Duque's resignation will placate them. That is extremely unlikely to happen. We are, after all, just a year away from a presidential election.

What's more, as alluded to above, the extent to which those protesting represent the majority of public opinion is difficult to measure. Taking it as a given that it's Colombia's centre-left/left behind most of this, if there was a presidential election next week, one would be taking a significant gamble betting on politicians from that side of the spectrum to be poll toppers.

While the more "visible" problem of police brutality is now driving the protests, the broader issue here is — and always has been — inequality in all its manifestations. For that, there is no quick-fix solution.

Of course, this doesn't mean that decision-makers just shrug their shoulders and say 'it is what it is.' The goal of achieving a more equal society has to start somewhere. One of those places, it can be argued, is with a fairer redistribution of wealth, i.e. tax reform and the like. Ring a bell?

In the same way, referring back to our opening lines, rebelling against everything with little rhyme or reason to proceedings is unlikely to lead to a glorious revolution.

Go ahead, tear down the structures and start again. To do that, one has to be prepared to shoulder the cost of reconstruction.
_______________________________________________________________
Listen to Wrong Way's Colombia Cast podcast here.

Facebook: Wrong Way Corrigan — The Blog & IQuiz "The Bogotá Pub Quiz".